State & Local Educational Foundation of KansasState & Local Educational Foundation of KansasState & Local Educational Foundation of Kansas
State & Local Educational Foundation of Kansas
Activities See all
There are no upcoming activities.
Join Now!

State & Local Educational Foundation of Kansas

Overland Park, KS | (913) 732-0010 | http://StateandLocalEducation.org

Welcome to the  Blog

From The Group Owner

Key Graphs from Friedman Foundation Poll on School Choice

Related article: "Friedman Foundation poll for Mother's Day - 71% of moms support school vouchers"





Below, I will highlight some of the findings of the poll by the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, demonstrating the strong support all around the country for school vouchers at the K-12 level.  Click here to go directly to the Friedman Foundation's Web site, where you can learn all of the detailed results and how the poll was performed. 

Interestingly, mothers of K-12 children support school vouchers even more than the average American.

The first graph I want to show you is Kansas school funding, which has increased about 90% since 1995, even though the inflate rate has only increased about 50% during that same time.  Today, we spend about $13,000 per student in K-12 government schools:

Click to enlarge





Key Take-Aways from the Friedman Foundation Poll:


1.  61% of moms support school vouchers, for both religious and non-religious education.

Click to enlarge:



2.  55% of moms would not choose public schools, and 37% would choose a private school, if they had choices.

Click to enlarge:
 

3.  Only 22% of Midwest adults rate public schools with an "A" grade.  Only 59% of adults give a "B" or "A" grade."

Click to enlarge:


4.  Even though almost half of adults do not know how to rate regional private schools or charter schools, only 42% of all adults would choose public schools as their first choice for their child's education.

 
Click to enlarge:


5.  Support for school vouchers is strong, among all adults nation-wide.

Click to enlarge:

 

 

                                                                                                                                                               Site Meter

Posted by Benjamin Hodge on Monday, May 14, 2012 at 8:45 AM

(0 Comments) Leave A Comment

Friedman Foundation poll for Mother's Day - 71% of moms support school vouchers

- Full report from the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice.


More information about the poll
:


Press release
from the Friedman Foundation:

Moms Say Kids Need School Vouchers

Wednesday, May 09, 2012

INDIANAPOLIS — Just in time for Mother’s Day, a new national poll of American mothers finds that 71 percent support school vouchers for all children to get the best education possible.

The poll, conducted April 17 to 24, asked mothers of school-aged children and other adults in a statistically representative national survey how they feel about education in their communities and school choice. A resounding 71 percent of moms said they believe school vouchers should be available to all families regardless of income or special needs.

“The bond between mother and child is precious; moms want and need options to help them access whatever type of education their child may need,” said Leslie Hiner, vice president of the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice. “They will go to great lengths to find a school that will help their child be successful. That’s why moms support school choice.”

Scholars debate whether educational options should only be offered to low-income children or those in failing schools, or to all children. According to data compiled by Braun Research Inc., most moms agree with Nobel laureate Milton Friedman who believed that educational choice should be available to all children.

Only 30 percent of mothers said that vouchers should be based on “financial need” compared to 71 percent of moms who said they should be available to “all families, regardless of incomes and special needs.”

“School vouchers are meant to create an option for all children who need a choice when their public school isn’t working for them,” said Robert Enlow, President and CEO of the Friedman Foundation. “Moms know what’s best for their kids.”

The poll also asked mothers and other adults to grade their local public schools, charter schools and private schools.

Of those mothers who offered specific grades (A to F), 65 percent of Moms graded their area public schools “A” or “B” compared to 83 percent of moms who gave the same high marks to parochial or private schools.

Other respondents had similar views – with 63 percent grading their local public schools “A” or “B” and 65 percent giving charter schools high grades. In contrast, 82 percent of the same respondents graded local parochial or private schools “A” or “B”.

The Friedman Foundation sponsored the poll conducted by Braun Research Incorporated (BRI). The polling project’s nationwide sample included 803 adults. BRI conducted additional interviews to achieve a nationally representative sample of mothers of school-aged children, totaling 401 interviews. The margin of error was ± 3.5 percentage points for the national sample and ± 4.9 percentage points for the moms’ sample.

To learn more about the poll go to: http://EdChoice.org/MomsPoll.

About the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice

The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit and nonpartisan organization, solely dedicated to advancing Milton and Rose Friedman’s vision of school choice for all children. First established as the Milton and Rose D. Friedman Foundation in 1996, the Foundation continues to promote school choice as the most effective and equitable way to improve the quality of K-12 education in America. The Foundation is dedicated to research, education, and outreach on the vital issues and implications related to choice and competition in K-12 education.

 

Contact

Susan Meyers

National Media Relations Director

Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice

E-Mail: Susan@EdChoice.org

Phone: 404-518-2271

 

###

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                               Site Meter

Posted by Benjamin Hodge on Sunday, May 13, 2012 at 7:58 PM

(0 Comments) Leave A Comment

"Constitution 101," a Free Educational Course from Hillsdale College - Study the Meaning and History of the US Constitution

"Constitution 101" - A free, 10-part recorded lecture series taught by faculty from Hillsdale College.

          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sign up here for Hillsdale College's free, top-notch educational video series on the US Constitution.

The course is broken up into a 10-part lecture series.  Each video is about 40 minutes long, and videos can be viewed online at any time, once they're made available.  The first week's lecture was published February 20, and the series runs through April 23.  You'll watch the videos on a YouTube page that can be accessed only with a direct link.  

Here's the official description:

Featuring an expanded format from the “Introduction to the Constitution” lecture series with Hillsdale College President Dr. Larry Arnn, Constitution 101 follows closely the one-semester course required of all Hillsdale College undergraduate students.

In this course, you can:

  • watch lectures from the same Hillsdale faculty who teach on campus;
  • study the same readings taught in the College course;
  • submit questions for weekly Q&A sessions with the faculty;
  • access a course study guide;
  • test your knowledge through weekly quizzes; and
  • upon completion of the course, receive a certificate from Hillsdale College.

Once you sign up, you'll get Email updates about new online material that's available.  You can also follow updates about the "Constitution 101" series on the series' unique Facebook page and Twitter account.

National Review Online contributer John J. Miller, the host of the weekly Q&A sessions, writes that "Hillsdale College is almost alone among colleges and universities in making its students take a course on the U.S. Constitution."

The 10 lecture topics are:

  1. The American Mind
  2. The Declaration of Independence
  3. The Problem of Majority Tyranny
  4. Separation of Powers: Preventing Tyranny
  5. Separation of Powers: Ensuring Good Government
  6. Religion, Morality, and Property
  7. Crisis of Constitutional Government
  8. Abraham Lincoln and the Constitution
  9. The Progressive Rejection of the Founding
  10. The Recovery of the Constitution

Erick Erickson, RedState editor and CNN contributor, writes:

If you are a regular reader of RedState, you’ll know I am a huge fan of Hillsdale College and am delighted to help them advertise a great program with Dr. Larry Arnn. The program is called “Constitution 101: The Meaning and History of the Constitution”. It is a 10-week online course providing a great learning experience about the Constitution.

There is no cost to register for this course, but I’d ask that you consider a donation to support Hillsdale’s efforts to educate millions of Americans about our nation’s Founding documents and principles.

To give you an idea of the quality of lectures, here is a five-part series from Hillsdale College that ran in September 2011,called "Introduction to the Constitution."  Here was the study guide from part I (PDF), and here is the video featuring Hillsdale President Dr. Larry Arnn:

 

Also, the college produced a "Constitution Day Celebration" on September 15, 2011, that features videos from Congressman Paul Ryan, US Attorney General Michael Mukasey, and Charles Krauthammer.

The college is located in Hillsdale, Michigan, and is a national leader in providing life-long education to Americans about limited government.  In particular, the college is:

[K]nown for being the first American college to prohibit in its charter all discrimination based on race, religion, or sex; its refusal of government funding; and its monthly publication, Imprimis.  National Review has described Hillsdale as a "citadel of American conservatism." [source: Wikipedia page for Hillsdale College]

Learn more about Hillsdale College at www.Hillsdale.edu.

Here is Hillsdale College's official Facebook page, and here's the college's Twitter page.  

While you're at it, you can also sign up for a free publication called "Imprimis" (rhymes with Don Imus), that is mailed to your mailbox once a month.  Generally, it's one major article per month.  You can view the archives online.

Article posted on Saturday, March 17, 2012.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Site Meter

 

 

Posted by Benjamin Hodge on Friday, March 30, 2012 at 4:01 PM

(0 Comments) Leave A Comment

What is "Agenda 21" from the United Nations? Americans for Prosperity hosts four events March 26-30.

Americans for Prosperity will be hosting four educational events on "Agenda 21" in Pittsburg, Overland Park, Wichita, and Topeka.  

From AFP's blog:

What is Agenda 21?

Agenda 21 is a plan to develop our communities under the guidance of the federal government and the U.N. Questions exist regarding whether this is an attack on individual liberties.

There will be a presentation about Agenda 21 and sustainable development in Pittsburg next Monday. Also, a national expert on this topic will speak in Overland Park, Wichita and Topeka, regarding the push of Agenda 21 in the name of economic development.

Pittsburg: 6 p.m. Monday, March 26 at the Homer Cole Senior Center (3003 N. Joplin, Pittsburg)

Tom DeWeese, President of the American Policy Center, will speak March 29-30 in Overland Park, Wichita and Topeka. Details are below:

Overland Park: 7:30 p.m. Thursday, March 29 at the Regnier Theater of the University of Kansas Edwards Campus (12600 Quivira Road, Overland Park)

Wichita: 11:45 a.m. Friday, March 30 at The Petroleum Club meeting (100 N. Broadway, 9th Floor, Wichita. This presentation is part of the Wichita

Pachyderm Club’s regular meeting.)

Topeka: 5:15 p.m. Friday, March 30 at The Celtic Fox (118 SW 8th Ave., Topeka. This presentation is part of the Topeka 9-12 Project’s regular meeting.)

DeWeese will explain the U.N.’s Agenda 21 initiative, and help you translate the vague terminology associated with Agenda 21 (think “community visioning,” “sustainable development,” “livable communities,” etc.).

We encourage you to attend one of these presentations, and learn more about this important topic. You can read more about it here.

 

Posted by Benjamin Hodge on Friday, March 23, 2012 at 5:32 PM

(0 Comments) Leave A Comment

Invitation -- March 8 Town Hall with Joshua Charles, co-author of "The Original Argument: The Federalists' Case for the Constitution, Adapted for the 21st Century"

You're invited to a free town hall Thursday night, March 8.  It's at 7 p.m. at Colonial Presbyterian Church near 135th and Quivira.

Please RSVP by clicking here to go to Eventbrite.

 

Our event features Joshua Charles (right), who co-authored Glenn Beck's recent book about the US Constitution, "The Original Argument."

Learn more about "The Original Argument" at Glenn Beck's site.

original argument, josh charles, glenn beck

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For driving directions to the event location, click here.

To view our full invitation that was mailed, click here or below.

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                 Site Meter

 

 

 

Posted by Benjamin Hodge on Friday, February 03, 2012 at 10:32 AM

(0 Comments) Leave A Comment

Our January 2012 mailing

Our first mailing went out to thousands of Johnson County, Kansas, residents in January 2012.  

Click the image below for a larger view of our introductory letter, about our organization and our goals.

 

 

                                                                                                                                                               Site Meter

 

 

 

Posted by Benjamin Hodge on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 at 9:23 AM

(0 Comments) Leave A Comment

Results, Part 4, Overland Park: Favorability Ratings for Kevin Yoder, Ed Eilert, Barack Obama, George W. Bush

State & Local Reform Educational Foundation of KS

Part 4 of results

    Telephone survey among likely 2012 voters in Overland Park, KS.  Conducted Tuesday, August 9, and Wednesday, August 10, by the State and Local Educational Foundation of Kansas.  

    Margin of error +/- 5.4%.  Party breakdown:  51% Republican, 29% Unaffiliated, 20% and Democratic.  55% Female, and 45% Male.  50% over the age of 50, and 50% under the age of 50. 

    For detailed accompanying information for comparison and background purposes, click here

    To read exact survey wording, click here.  To view part 1 of our results, click here.  To view part 2 of our results, click here.  To view part 3 of our results, click here.  More information about survey methodology can be found at the bottom of this page.

 

 

Question:  “I will now list the names of several public figures and groups, and we would like to know your opinion of them. It's OK if you have not heard of them.  What is your opinion of…?”

Kevin Yoder                                     Count Percent

            Very favorable:                          58      17.1%

 

            Somewhat favorable:              96       28.2%

 

            Somewhat unfavorable:          38      11.2%

 

            Very unfavorable:                      54      15.9%

 

            Heard of, but no opinion:        71      20.9%

 

            Have never heard of:                 23      6.8%

 

Total:                         340       100%

 

Among Republicans            Count  Percent

Very favorable:                           46     26.4%

Somewhat favorable:               65     37.4%

Somewhat unfavorable:           11     6.3%

Very unfavorable:                      18     10.3%

Heard of, but no opinion:          26    14.9%

Have never heard of:                   8     4.6%

 

Total:                            174       100%                              

[Note: Sample size=174; Margin of error=7.6%]

 

Over 50                                  Count  Percent

Very favorable:                          36     21.2%

Somewhat favorable:              46     27.1%

Somewhat unfavorable:         21     12.4%

Very unfavorable:                     30     17.7%

Heard of, but no opinion:        26     15.3%

Have never heard of:               11     6.5%

 

            Total:                             170       100%

[Note: Sample size=170; Margin of error=7.7%]

 

Under 50                                Count  Percent

Very favorable:                           22     12.9%

Somewhat favorable:               50     29.4%

Somewhat unfavorable:          17     10.0%

Very unfavorable:                      24     14.1%

Heard of, but no opinion:         45     26.5%

Have never heard of:                 12      7.1%

 

            Total:                             170       100%

[Note: Sample size=170; Margin of error=7.7%]


Conservatives                        Count  Percent

Very favorable:                            46     28.4%

Somewhat favorable:                62     38.3%

Somewhat unfavorable:             9       5.6%

Very unfavorable:                        14     8.6%

Heard of, but no opinion:           26     16.1%

Have never heard of:                   5       3.1%

 

            Total:                             162       100%

            [Note: Sample size=162; Margin of error=7.9%]

 

Moderates                              Count  Percent

Very favorable:                            11      8.9%

Somewhat favorable:                26     21.1%

Somewhat unfavorable:            20     16.3%

Very unfavorable:                        22     17.9%

Heard of, but no opinion:          34     27.6%

Have never heard of:                  10      8.1%

 

            Total:                             123       100%

            [Note: Sample size=123; Margin of error=9.0%]

 

 

 

Ed Eilert                                         Count Percent

            Very favorable:                        57        16.8%

 

            Somewhat favorable:           103      30.3%

 

            Somewhat unfavorable:        36       10.6%

 

            Very unfavorable:                    20        5.9%

 

            Heard of, but no opinion:       84       24.7%

 

            Have never heard of:               40        11.8%

 

Total:                             340       100%

 

Among Republicans            Count  Percent

Very favorable:                           38     21.8%

Somewhat favorable:               59     33.9%

Somewhat unfavorable:           22     12.6%

Very unfavorable:                       11        6.3%

Heard of, but no opinion:          26     14.9%

Have never heard of:                 18     10.3%

 

Total:                            174       100%                              

[Note: Sample size=174; Margin of error=7.6%]

 

Over 50                                  Count  Percent

Very favorable:                        34        20.0%

Somewhat favorable:            59        34.7%

Somewhat unfavorable:        20       11.8%

Very unfavorable:                      9        5.3%

Heard of, but no opinion:       31        18.2%

Have never heard of:              17        10.0%

 

            Total:                             170       100%

[Note: Sample size=170; Margin of error=7.7%]

 

Under 50                                Count  Percent

Very favorable:                        23         13.5%

Somewhat favorable:            44         25.9%

Somewhat unfavorable:        16         9.4%

Very unfavorable:                    11         6.5%

Heard of, but no opinion:       53       31.2%

Have never heard of:               23       13.5%

 

            Total:                             170       100%

[Note: Sample size=170; Margin of error=7.7%]


Conservatives                        Count  Percent

Very favorable:                          34          21.0%

Somewhat favorable:              49          30.3%

Somewhat unfavorable:          20        12.4%

Very unfavorable:                     12           7.4%

Heard of, but no opinion:         35         21.6%

Have never heard of:                12          7.4%

 

            Total:                             162       100%

            [Note: Sample size=162; Margin of error=7.9%]

 

Moderates                              Count  Percent

Very favorable:                        16          13.0%

Somewhat favorable:             42         34.2%

Somewhat unfavorable:          9           7.3%

Very unfavorable:                      6           4.9%

Heard of, but no opinion:       31        25.2%

Have never heard of:              19         15.5%

 

            Total:                             123       100%

            [Note: Sample size=123; Margin of error=9.0%]

 

Barack Obama                             Count Percent

            Very favorable:                     63          18.5%

 

            Somewhat favorable:         70          20.6%

 

            Somewhat unfavorable:     56         16.5%

 

            Very unfavorable:                142         41.8%

 

            Heard of, but no opinion:       8         2.4%

 

            Have never heard of:               1         0.3%

 

Total:                             340       100%

 

Over 50                                  Count  Percent

Very favorable:                         39      22.9%

Somewhat favorable:             29      17.1%

Somewhat unfavorable:         25     14.7%

Very unfavorable:                   74       43.5%

Heard of, but no opinion:        3       1.8%

Have never heard of:                0       0.0%

 

            Total:                             170       100%

[Note: Sample size=170; Margin of error=7.7%]

 

Under 50                                Count  Percent

Very favorable:                         24       14.1%

Somewhat favorable:             41       24.1%

Somewhat unfavorable:         31      18.2%

Very unfavorable:                     68      40.0%

Heard of, but no opinion:          5       2.9%

Have never heard of:                 1        0.6%

 

            Total:                             170       100%

[Note: Sample size=170; Margin of error=7.7%]



George W. Bush                                 Count Percent

            Very favorable:                              55     16.2%

 

            Somewhat favorable:                 119     35.0%

 

            Somewhat unfavorable:              55     16.2%

 

            Very unfavorable:                         102     30.0%

 

            Heard of, but no opinion:              7       2.1%

 

            Have never heard of:                     2       0.6%

 

Total:                             340       100%

 

Among Republicans            Count  Percent

Very favorable:                           47      27.0%

Somewhat favorable:               82      47.1%

Somewhat unfavorable:           26     14.9%

Very unfavorable:                      16       9.2%

Heard of, but no opinion:           2       1.2%

Have never heard of:                  1       0.6%

 

Total:                            174       100%                              

[Note: Sample size=174; Margin of error=7.6%]

 

Over 50                                  Count  Percent

Very favorable:                          26     15.3%

Somewhat favorable:              56     32.9%

Somewhat unfavorable:         26     15.3%

Very unfavorable:                     57     33.5%

Heard of, but no opinion:         3      1.8%

Have never heard of:                2      1.2%

 

            Total:                             170       100%

[Note: Sample size=170; Margin of error=7.7%]

 

Under 50                                Count  Percent

Very favorable:                           29     17.1%

Somewhat favorable:               63     37.1%

Somewhat unfavorable:          29     17.1%     

Very unfavorable:                      45     26.5%

Heard of, but no opinion:          4       2.4%

Have never heard of:                 0       0.0%

 

            Total:                             170       100%

[Note: Sample size=170; Margin of error=7.7%]


Conservatives                        Count  Percent

Very favorable:                            42     25.9%

Somewhat favorable:                79     48.8%

Somewhat unfavorable:            21     13.0%

Very unfavorable:                        17     4.3%

Heard of, but no opinion:            2     1.2%

Have never heard of:                   1      0.6%

 

            Total:                             162       100%

            [Note: Sample size=162; Margin of error=7.9%]

 

Moderates                              Count  Percent

Very favorable:                            13     10.6%

Somewhat favorable:                35     28.5%

Somewhat unfavorable:            27     22.0%

Very unfavorable:                        43     35.0%

Heard of, but no opinion:            4       3.3%

Have never heard of:                    1      0.8%

 

            Total:                             123       100%

            [Note: Sample size=123; Margin of error=9.0%]

 

 

Further information on methodology:  The survey was performed using a recorded voice, and respondents were asked to push buttons to answer questions.  Voters were called if they were registered to vote in Overland Park, and if they had voted in the November election of 2008 and/or the November election of 2010. Gender and age were determined by question, and party affiliation was determined by registration data. 

 



                                                                                                                                                               Site Meter

 

Posted by Benjamin Hodge on Monday, October 03, 2011 at 12:47 PM

(0 Comments) Leave A Comment

Results, Part 3, Overland Park: Political Ideology of Region, Favorability Ratings for Sam Brownback, Kris Kobach, Kansas City Star, Steve Rose

State & Local Reform Educational Foundation of KS

Part 3 of results

    Telephone survey among likely 2012 voters in Overland Park, KS.  Conducted Tuesday, August 9, and Wednesday, August 10, by the State and Local Educational Foundation of Kansas.  Margin of error +/- 5.4%.  Party breakdown:  51% Republican, 29% Unaffiliated, 20% and Democratic.  55% Female, and 45% Male.  50% over the age of 50, and 50% under the age of 50. 

    For detailed accompanying information for comparison and background purposes, click here.  To view part 1 of our results, click here.  To view part 2 of our results, click here.  More information about survey methodology can be found at the bottom of this page.

 

Summary:

- Overland Park:

    Our results indicate that 48% of Overland Park's voters are conservative (among likely November Overland Park voters).  This includes 16% who are "very conservative."  Thirty-six percent (36%) are moderate, and 16% are either "somewhat liberal" or "very liberal."

    Given that Overland Park's voters supported John McCain over Barack Obama by a 53-46% margin, when the nation voted for Obama by a 53-46% margin, our results are comparable to Gallup's national numbers.  According to Gallup, 41% of United States adults are conservative.

Other comparisons:

- Our results show 66% of Republicans to be either "very" or "somewhat conservative."  Gallup's figure was 71%.

- Gallup found 24% of Republicans to be moderate.  Our number was 29%.

- Among Independents, Gallup found 35% to be conservative, and 44% to be moderate.  We found 34% of Unaffiliated voters to be conservative, and 45% to be moderate.

Age and poltical views:  

  Among likely 2012 voters in Overland Park, 48% are over the age of 50, and 52% are under the age of 50.  We find that over-50 likely Overland Park voters are only slightly more conservative than under-50 Overland Park voters.  However, it is within the margin of error in our sub-sample (there was a sample size of 170 each of over-50 and under-50 voters, with a margin of error of 7.7% for each sub-sample).  

  Among over-50 voters in Overland Park, 49% are conservative; among under-50 voters, 46% are conservative.  There are slightly fewer moderate voters among over-50 (35%) than with under-50 voters (37%).  Among over-50 voters, 15% self-identified as liberal; 17% of under-50 likely Overland Park voters are liberal.

 

Sam Brownback favorability ratings:

  Note that asking voters about a politician's favorability is not exactly the same as asking about job approval, but the two are similar and are connected.  For fully-known politicians, favorability numbers can be considered a ceiling (voters may personally like an elected official more than they like the job performance of that official).

  In 2010, Governor Sam Brownback, a Republican, won about 63% of the state-wide vote.  Brownback also won 63% of the vote both in Johnson County and in Overland Park.

  Our survey finds that Gov. Brownback has a healthy favorability rating, but it's not notably strong.  Overall, Brownback has a 52% favorable, 37% unfavorable rating.  10% had no opinion.  This is comparable to Survey USA's June 23, 2011, findings, in which 47% of state-wide adults approved of Brownback's job as governor, 45% disapproved, and 8% were not sure.

    Brownback is viewed favorably by 72% of Republicans, by 78% of conservatives, and 37% of moderates.  Fifty-one percent (51%) of voters over the age of 50 view him favorably, and 54% of voters under 50 view him favorably.

    Overall, 19% of voters view Brownback "very favorably," and 22% view him "very unfavorably."  Among Republicans, 32% answered "very favorable," as did 34% of conservatives.


Kris Kobach favorability ratings:

    Kobach is a past Overland Park Councilman, was a candidate for the Kansas Senate in 2000, and was the Republican nominee for US Congress in 2004.  Kobach is a frequent target of attacks by liberals, such as those at The Kansas City Star and former Johnson County Sun publisher Steve Rose.  Kobach hosts a weekly Sunday-night radio show on KCMO 710 AM.

    In 2010, Kansans gave Republican candidate Kris Kobach 59% of the vote.  Johnson County voted for Kobach with 60% of the total vote, and Overland Park awarded 59% of the vote to Kobach.

    Among likely 2012 voters, Secretary of State Kris Kobach has about 70% "hard name ID," referring to those voters who have an opinion of him.  Ten percent (10%) did not recognize his name, and another 21% had heard of him but had no opinion.  

    Overall, Kobach has remarkably strong favorability rating, all things considered.  His "very favorable" numbers among conservatives and Republicans are nearly identical to those of Gov. Brownback, despite Kobach's lower familiarity with all voters.

    Kobach is viewed favorably by 39% of likely voters, 30% view him unfavorably, and 21% have heard of him but have no opinion.  Eighteen percent (18%) have a "very favorable" opinion of Kobach, and 18% have a "very unfavorable" opinion. 

    Among Republicans, Kobach's totals are 59% favorable and 22% unfavorable.  Thirty-three percent (33%) of Republicans view him "very favorably," and 10% of Republicans view him "very unfavorably."  Five percent (5%) did not recognize Kobach's name, and another 14% had heard of him but had no opinion.

    Conservatives give Kobach a 33% "very favorable" rating, and a 6% "very unfavorable" rating.  Overall, 65% of conservatives view Kobach favorably, and 14% view him unfavorably.

    Among moderates, 4% view him "very favorably," and 24% view him "very unfavorably."  Moderates gives Kobach a total favorably rating of 18%, and a total unfavorable rating of 42%.

    Kobach is better known among voters over the age of 50.  Over-50 voters give Kobach a 40% favorable and 33% unfavorable rating.  Seventeen percent (17%) have no opinion of Kobach, and another 9% have never heard of him.

    Among voters under the age of 50 years, 37% view Kobach favorably, 27% view him unfavorably, 25% have heard of him but have no opinion, and 11% did not recognize Kobach's name.

 

Kansas City Star ratings:

    The Kansas City Star is universally recognized, but fewer than half of likely Overland Park voters have a favorable opinion of the publication.  Forty seven percent (47%) of voters have a favorable opinion of The Star, and 44% have an unfavorable opinion.

    The paper is very divisive.  As demonstrated earlier, 48% of Overland Park voters are conservative:  27% of conservatives have a favorable opinion of The Star, and 65% have an unfavorable opinion of the paper.  This includes 6% of conservatives who have a "very favorable" opinion, and 35% have a "very unfavorable" opinion.

    Among moderates, 58% view The Star favorably, and 33% view it unfavorably.

 

Steve Rose ratings:

    Rose is the former owner and publisher of The Johnson County Sun, founded by his father in 1950.  This poll was performed before it was announced that The Sun would no longer be in business.  Rose is currently a columnist for The Star, has hosted at least one local television show, has co-hosted at least one radio program, and he is considered a "friend of the program" to Mike Shanin and Scott Parks' radio program on KMBZ 980 AM.  He is a reliable critic of fiscal conservatives, of challengers to monopolized K-12 government education, and of pro-life politicians.

    Relative to all of his exposure, Rose is quite unknown to voters in Overland Park, a city in the heart of the general readership area for The Sun and The Star. 

    Overall, 80% are familiar with Steve Rose's name, and 59% have an opinion of him.  Thirty-two percent (32%) have a favorable opinion of Rose, and 28% have an unfavorable opinion.  Seven percent (7%) view him "very favorably," and 10% view him "very unfavorably."

    Among over-50 voters, 35% have a favorable opinion of Rose, and 37% have an unfavorable opinion, 17% have heard of him but have no opinion, and 12% have not heard of Rose.

    Among under-50 voters, 28% view Rose favorably, 19% view him unfavorably, 24% are neutral towards him, and another 29% of under-50 voters say they've never heard of Rose.

    Thirty-two percent (32%) of Republicans view him favorably, and 39% view him unfavorably.  This includes 8% who view him "very favorably" and 16% who view him "very unfavorably."

    Thirty-two percent (32%) of conservatives view Rose favorably, and 36% view him unfavorably.  Seven percent (7%) of conservatives have a "very favorable" opinion of Rose, and 15% have a "very unfavorable" opinion."

    Moderate Overland Park voters give Rose a 31% favorable rating, and a 20% unfavorable rating.  Only 6% give him a "very favorable" opinion, with another 6% saying they have a "very unfavorable" opinion of Rose.

 

Comparing political views (ideology) nation-wide with Overland Park's voters:

 

Kansas:

There are actually 20 states which Gallup considers to be more conservative than Kansas.  Gallup ranks Kansas as #21 among the states, in terms of how many voters are considered to be conservative.  

Gallup considers 40% of Kansas voters to be conservative, 39% to be moderate, and 19% to be liberal.  

According to Gallup, Alabama ranks #1 with 49% of its voters identified as conservative.  Washington, DC, ranks last, with only 23% of its voters considered to be conservative.

 

Nation-wide:

According to an August 1, 2011, report from Gallup, 41% of American adults are conservative, 36% are moderate, and 21% are liberal.  

Among all adults:   

- 11% are very conservative

- 30% are conservative

- 36% are moderate

- 15% are liberal

- 6% are very liberal

Among Republicans:

- 21% are very conservative

- 50% are conservative

- 24% are moderate

- 3% are liberal

- 1% are very liberal

Among Independent voters:

- 8% are very conservative

- 27% are conservative

- 44% are moderate

- 14% are liberal

- 6% are very liberal

According to an August 18, 2011, report from Rasmussen Reports:

"Forty-three percent (43%) of voters say they are conservative when it comes to fiscal issues such as taxes, government spending and business regulation.  Thirty-seven percent (37%) characterize themselves as moderates in this area, while 14% are fiscal liberals.

When it comes to social issues like abortion, public prayer and church-state topics: 36% say they are conservative, 29% moderate and another 32% liberal."

More from this August 2011 article by Rasmussen:  

"The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 28% of Likely Voters say they are both fiscal and social conservatives.  Just 12% say they are liberal in both areas, while 60% are some other combination."

...

"Among voters who are conservative on fiscal issues, 64% are also conservative when it comes to social issues.  Twenty-four percent (24%) of fiscal conservatives are moderates on social issues and 11% are liberal.  Among fiscal moderates, 42% of moderate on social issues as well and 39% are social liberals.

As for fiscal liberals, 88% are also liberal on social issues. 

More men than women tend to be conservative on both social and fiscal issues.  Voters over 40 are more conservative both fiscally and socially than those who are younger.

Seventy-eight percent (78%) of Republicans are fiscal conservatives, while a plurality of both Democrats (46%) and voters not affiliated with either major political party (44%) see themselves as moderates on money issues.  As for social issues, two-out-of-three (66%) GOP voters are conservative, while a majority (53%) of Democrats are liberals. Unaffiliated voters are more closely divided."


 

Background on Kansas-wide elections and Overland Park elections:

Registration:  

State of Kansas and City of Overland Park:

Based on voter registration, Overland Park is technically a more heavily Republican area and less Democratic area, compared to the state of Kansas.  However, the city's voters often end up being less supportive of Republican candidates, compared to state-wide voters.  Kansas-wide, about 45% of voters are registered as Republicans, 27% are Democratic, and and 28% are Unaffiliated.  In Overland Park, 51% are registered as Republicans, 23% as Democrats, and 26% are either Unaffiliated or another party.  The likely implication:  In Overland Park, a sizeable minority of registered Republican voters probably rarely vote for the conservative and/or Republican candidate.

Nation-wide:

According to an August 1, 2011, article by Rasmussen Reports, about 35% of Americans were considered to be Democrats, 33% were Republicans, and 32% were Independents:  

"In July, 34.8% of adults consider themselves to be Democrats, virtually unchanged from 34.7% in June. The number of Republicans fell from 35.6% in May to 34.4% in June to 33.1% in July. That’s the lowest total for the GOP since July 2010. For Democrats, the current results are in the middle of a narrow range they’ve occupied for the first six months of 2011. Voters not affiliated with either party grew from 31.0% in June to 32.1% in July. Over the past year, the gap between the two parties has been two points or less with just two exceptions."

Click here to view a history of partisan trends going back to 2004, according to Rasmussen Reports.

2008 election review:

President:  

In 2008, the nation voted 53% for Democrat Barack Obama and 46% for Republican John McCain.  Kansas as a whole voted for the Republican by a 57-42% margin.  Johnson County voted for the Republican John McCain by a 54-45% margin, out of about 285,000 votes cast.  Overland Park supported the Republican McCain with 53% of the vote, and Democrat Obama with 46%, out of about 120,000 ballots cast.

US Senate:

Kansas voted for incumbent Republican Pat Roberts over Democrat Jim Slattery by a 60-36% margin.  Johnson County supported the Republican by a 58-39% margin.  As well, Overland Park voted for Republican Pat Roberts with 58% of all votes, and Democrat Jim Slattery with 39%.

US Congress:

Johnson County voted to re-elect 3rd District Congressman Dennis Moore, a Democrat, with 51% of the vote, over Republican State Senator Nick Jordan, who received 45% of the vote.  Overland Park was tougher on the Republican:  Democrat Dennis Moore received 52%, and the Republican Nick Jordan received 43%.

2010 election review:

US Senate:

Kansas voted for Republican Jerry Moran with 70% of the vote; Democrat Lisa Johnston received 26%.  Johnson County, out of about 185,000 total votes cast, gave Republican Moran 66% of the vote, and Democrat Johnston 30%.  About 120,000 people voted in Overland Park:  65% of the voters supported Republican Jerry Moran, and Democrat Lisa Johnston was supported by 32% of voters. 

US Congress:

When considering the results, note that Republican Kevin Yoder represented an Overland Park Kansas House district from 2002-2010.  Johnson Countyvoted for Kevin Yoder with 65% of the vote, and gave Democrat Stephene Moore 33% of the vote. Similar to the county as a whole, Overland Park voters gave Republican Yoder about 65% of the vote, Democrat Stephene Moore received 33%.


 

 

Question:  "In general, how would you describe your political views?"

Ideology (all voters):                        Count Percent

- Very conservative:                               55      16.2%

 

- Somewhat conservative:                 107      31.5%

 

- Moderate:                                           123      36.2%

 

- Somewhat liberal:                              40      11.8%

 

- Very liberal:                                          15        4.4%

 

Total:                                     340       100%

 

Among Republicans               Count Percent

Very conservative:                        46      26.4%

Somewhat conservative:            69      39.7%

Moderate:                                      51      29.3%

Somewhat liberal:                         8        4.6%

Very liberal:                                     0           0%

 

Total:                             174       100%

 [Note: Sample size=174; Margin of error=7.6%]

 

Among Unaffiliateds               Count Percent

Very conservative:                         6      6.1%

Somewhat conservative:           27    27.6%  

Moderate:                                    44      44.9%

Somewhat liberal:                     16      16.3%

Very liberal:                                    5      5.1%

 

             Total:                               98       100%

            [Note: Sample size=98; Margin of error=10.1%]

 

Over age 50                            Count  Percent

Very conservative:                        30    17.7%

Somewhat conservative:            54    31.8%

Moderate:                                      60    35.3%

Somewhat liberal:                       17    10.0%

Very liberal:                                    9        5.3%

 

            Total:                             170       100%

[Note: Sample size=170; Margin of error=7.7%]

 

Under age 50                         Count  Percent

Very conservative:                       25     14.7%

Somewhat conservative:           53     31.2%

Moderate:                                     63     37.1%

Somewhat liberal:                       23     13.5%

Very liberal:                                     6     3.5%

 

            Total:                             170       100%

[Note: Sample size=170; Margin of error=7.7%]

 

 

Question:  “I will now list the names of several public figures and groups, and we would like to know your opinion of them. It's OK if you have not heard of them.  What is your opinion of…?”

Sam Brownback                               Count Percent

            Very favorable:                              66    19.4%

 

            Somewhat favorable:                 111    32.7%

 

            Somewhat unfavorable:              49     14.4%

 

            Very unfavorable:                          76    22.4%

 

            Heard of, but no opinion:             34    10.0%

 

            Have never heard of:                       4    1.2%

 

Total:                             340       100%

 

Among Republicans            Count  Percent

Very favorable:                           56        32.2%

Somewhat favorable:               69        39.7%

Somewhat unfavorable:           20        5.9%

Very unfavorable:                      19        10.9%

Heard of, but no opinion:          9          5.2%

Have never heard of:                 1          0.6%

 

Total:                            174       100%                              

[Note: Sample size=174; Margin of error=7.6%]

 

Over 50                                  Count  Percent

Very favorable:                          33        19.4%

Somewhat favorable:              53        31.2%

Somewhat unfavorable:         18        10.6%

Very unfavorable:                     49        28.8%

Heard of, but no opinion:         16        9.4%

Have never heard of:                 1          0.6%

 

            Total:                             170       100%

[Note: Sample size=170; Margin of error=7.7%]

 

Under 50                                Count  Percent

Very favorable:                           33        19.4%

Somewhat favorable:               58        34.1%

Somewhat unfavorable:          31        18.2%

Very unfavorable:                      27        15.9%

Heard of, but no opinion:        18        10.6%

Have never heard of:                  3          1.8%

 

            Total:                             170       100%

[Note: Sample size=170; Margin of error=7.7%]


Conservatives                        Count  Percent

Very favorable:                            55       34.0%

Somewhat favorable:                71        43.8%

Somewhat unfavorable:            16        9.9%

Very unfavorable:                        10       6.2%

Heard of, but no opinion:           9          5.6%

Have never heard of:                   1         0.6%

 

            Total:                             162       100%

            [Note: Sample size=162; Margin of error=7.9%]

 

Moderates                              Count  Percent

Very favorable:                            11        8.9%

Somewhat favorable:                34        27.6%

Somewhat unfavorable:            20       16.3%

Very unfavorable:                       35        28.5%

Heard of, but no opinion:         21        17.1%

Have never heard of:                   2          1.6%

 

            Total:                             123       100%

            [Note: Sample size=123; Margin of error=9.0%]

 

 

Kris Kobach                                      Count  Percent

            Very favorable:                          60        17.7%

 

            Somewhat favorable:               72        21.2%

 

            Somewhat unfavorable:           40        11.8%

 

            Very unfavorable:                       62        18.2%

 

            Heard of, but no opinion:         71        20.9%

 

            Have never heard of:                 35        10.3%

 

Total:                           340       100%

 

Among Republicans               Count Percent

Very favorable:                             57        32.8%

Somewhat favorable:                  46        26.4%

Somewhat unfavorable:             22        12.6%

Very unfavorable:                         17        9.8%

Heard of, but no opinion:             24        13.8%

Have never heard of:                    8          4.6%

 

Total:                             174       100%                

[Note: Sample size=174; Margin of error=7.6%]

 

Over 50                                  Count  Percent

Very favorable:                         34        20.0%

Somewhat favorable:               35        20.1%

Somewhat unfavorable:         18        10.6%

Very unfavorable:                       38       22.4%

Heard of, but no opinion:         29        17.1%

Have never heard of:                  16       9.4%

 

            Total:                             170      100%

[Note: Sample size=170; Margin of error=7.7%]

 

Under 50                                Count  Percent

Very favorable:                          26        15.3%

Somewhat favorable:                37        21.8%

Somewhat unfavorable:           22       12.9%

Very unfavorable:                      24        14.1%

Heard of, but no opinion:          42       24.7%

Have never heard of:                19        11.2%

 

            Total:                             170       100%

[Note: Sample size=170; Margin of error=7.7%]

 

Conservatives                        Count  Percent

Very favorable:                          54        33.3%

Somewhat favorable:                51        31.5%

Somewhat unfavorable:          12         7.4%

Very unfavorable:                      10         6.2%

Heard of, but no opinion:         26        16.1%

Have never heard of:                  9           5.6%

 

            Total:                             162       100%

            [Note: Sample size=162; Margin of error=7.9%]

 

Moderates                              Count  Percent

Very favorable:                            5          4.1%

Somewhat favorable:                17        13.8%

Somewhat unfavorable:           22        17.9%

Very unfavorable:                       30        24.4%

Heard of, but no opinion:          30        24.4%

Have never heard of:                 19        15.5%

 

            Total:                             123       100%

            [Note: Sample size=123; Margin of error=9.0%]

 

The Kansas City Star                       Count Percent

            Very favorable:                           35        10.3%

 

            Somewhat favorable:                125      36.8%

 

            Somewhat unfavorable:           79        23.2%

           

            Very unfavorable:                      72        21.2%

 

            Heard of, but no opinion:          27        7.9%

 

            Have never heard of:                   2         0.6%

 

Total:                             340       100%

  

Among Republicans               Count  Percent

Very favorable:                            13        7.5%

Somewhat favorable:                  45        25.9%

Somewhat unfavorable:             47        27.0%

Very unfavorable:                         56       32.2%

Heard of, but no opinion:           13        7.5%

Have never heard of:                    0          0%

 

Total:                             174       100%                                

[Note: Sample size=174; Margin of error=7.6%]

 

Over 50                                  Count  Percent

Very favorable:                         24        14.1%

Somewhat favorable:               61        35.9%

Somewhat unfavorable:         33        19.4%

Very unfavorable:                     41        24.1%

Heard of, but no opinion:          9         5.3%

Have never heard of:                 2         1.2%

 

            Total:                             170       100%

[Note: Sample size=170; Margin of error=7.7%]

 

Under 50                                Count  Percent

Very favorable:                        11        6.5%

Somewhat favorable:               64        37.7%

Somewhat unfavorable:          46        27.1%

Very unfavorable:                      31       18.2%

Heard of, but no opinion:        18          10.6%

Have never heard of:                 0          0%

 

            Total:                             170       100%

 

[Note: Sample size=170; Margin of error=7.7%]

 

Conservatives                        Count  Percent

Very favorable:                           10       6.2%

Somewhat favorable:               35       21.6%

Somewhat unfavorable:           48       29.6%

Very unfavorable:                      57       35.2%

Heard of, but no opinion:          11       6.8%

Have never heard of:                 1          0.6%

 

            Total:                             162       100%

            [Note: Sample size=162; Margin of error=7.9%]

 

Moderates                              Count  Percent

Very favorable:                         16        13.0%

Somewhat favorable:              55        44.7%

Somewhat unfavorable:         26        21.1%

Very unfavorable:                     14        11.4%

Heard of, but no opinion:        11        8.9%

Have never heard of:                 1         0.8%

 

            Total:                             123       100%

            [Note: Sample size=123; Margin of error=9.0%]

 

 

Steve Rose                                        Count Percent

            Very favorable:                          24        7.1%

 

            Somewhat favorable:                83        24.4%

 

            Somewhat unfavorable:          60        17.7%

 

            Very unfavorable:                      35        10.3%

 

            Heard of, but no opinion:         69        20.3%

 

            Have never heard of:                 69        20.3%

 

Total:                             340       100%

 

Among Republicans               Count Percent

Very favorable:                            14        8.1%

Somewhat favorable:                41        23.6%

Somewhat unfavorable:           41        23.6%

Very unfavorable:                       27        15.5%

Heard of, but no opinion:          21        12.1%

Have never heard of:                 30        17.2%

 

Total:                             174       100%                                              

[Note: Sample size=174; Margin of error=7.6%]

 

Over 50                                  Count  Percent

Very favorable:                       14        8.2%

Somewhat favorable:                45        26.5%

Somewhat unfavorable:         42        24.7%

Very unfavorable:                     21        12.4%

Heard of, but no opinion:        28        16.5%

Have never heard of:               20        11.8%

 

            Total:                             170       100%

[Note: Sample size=170; Margin of error=7.7%]

 

Under 50                                Count  Percent

Very favorable:                          10        5.9%

Somewhat favorable:               38        22.4%

Somewhat unfavorable:          18        10.6%

Very unfavorable:                      14        8.2%

Heard of, but no opinion:         41        24.1%

Have never heard of:                49        28.8%

 

            Total:                             170       100%

[Note: Sample size=170; Margin of error=7.7%]

 

Conservatives                        Count  Percent

Very favorable:                          12        7.4%

Somewhat favorable:               39       24.1%

Somewhat unfavorable:          33        19.4%

Very unfavorable:                      25       14.7%

Heard of, but no opinion:        29       17.1%

Have never heard of:                24       14.1%

 

            Total:                             162       100%

            [Note: Sample size=162; Margin of error=7.9%]

 

Moderates                              Count  Percent

Very favorable:                           7         5.7%

Somewhat favorable:               31       25.2%

Somewhat unfavorable:         18        14.6%

Very unfavorable:                       7         5.7%

Heard of, but no opinion:        28        22.8%

Have never heard of:               32        26.0%

 

            Total:                             123       100%

            [Note: Sample size=123; Margin of error=9.0%]

 

 

 

Further information on methodology:  The survey was performed using a recorded voice, and respondents were asked to push buttons to answer questions.  Voters were called if they were registered to vote in Overland Park, and if they had voted in the November election of 2008 and/or the November election of 2010. Gender and age were determined by question, and party affiliation was determined by registration data. 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                               Site Meter

Posted by Benjamin Hodge on Saturday, August 20, 2011 at 4:06 PM

(0 Comments) Leave A Comment

Results, Part 2: Overland Park Voters Think City Tax Increases Will Hurt Economy, and City Spending Cuts Will Help Economy

State & Local Reform Educational Foundation of KS

 

Part 2 of results

    Telephone survey among likely November 2012 voters in Overland Park, KS.  Conducted Tuesday, August 9; and Wednesday, August 10.  Margin of error +/- 5.4%.  Party breakdown:  51% Republican, 29% Unaffiliated, 20% and Democratic.  55% Female, and 45% Male.  50% over the age of 50, and 50% under the age of 50. 

    For survey wording (questions 1 through 18), click here.  For accompanying information for comparison and background purposes, click here.  To view part 1 of our results, click here.  More information about survey methodology can be found at the bottom of this page. 

    You can compare our results to similar questions asked to national voters by Rasmussen Reports (April 27-28, 2011, here, and August 7-8, 2011, here) and by the Pew Research Center on July 20-24, 2011.  Scroll to the bottom of this page for more information about these Rasmussen and Pew Research polls.

 

Question:  "Do you think city tax increases help the local economy, hurt the local economy, or have no impact on the economy?"  (Question #12 on our survey)

Impact of city tax increases

    on local economy:                        Count  Percent

            Help the local economy:           71       20.9%

 

            Hurt the local economy:          199       58.5%

 

            No impact:                                    50      14.7%

 

            Undecided:                                  20        5.9%

 

Total:                        340       100%


Question:  "Do you think decreases in government spending by the city, would help the local economy, hurt the local economy, or have no impact on the economy?" (Question #13 on our survey)

Impact of city spending

    cuts on local economy:                Count  Percent

            Help the local economy:           149      43.8%

 

            Hurt the local economy:              93       27.4%

 

            No impact:                                     76       22.4%

 

            Undecided:                                   22        6.5%

 

Total:                        340       100%

 

 

TO COMPARE:  A Look at Similar National Polls

On April 30, 2011, Rasmussen Reports wrote:  

"A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 53% of Likely U.S. Voters say, generally speaking, tax cuts help the economy.  Most voters have shared that sentiment in surveys for years. Only 21% believe tax cuts hurt the economy, while 13% say they have no impact.  Another 13% are not sure. (to see survey question wording, click here.)

A plurality (48%) of voters say decreases in government spending will help the economy.  Twenty-nine percent (29%) say cutting government spending will hurt the economy.  Ten percent (10%) believe such decreases will have no impact, while 13% are not sure. These findings, too, have remained fairly consistent over the years."

On August 12, 2011, Rasmussen wrote:  

"When it comes to job creation and improving the overall economy, voters think tax cuts will work better than government solutions.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of Likely U.S. Voters shows that 62% believe cutting taxes is better than increasing government spending when it comes to creating jobs. Twenty percent (20%) say increased government spending does more to create jobs, while nearly the same number (18%) are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.) 

Voters are more narrowly divided on what's better for the economy in the long term. While 38% think government job creation is the better way to go, 49% say tax cuts are a better long-term solution. Twelve percent (12%) are not sure.

These results are not surprising considering voters have consistently said that cutting taxes and reducing government spending are good for the economy. 

The partisan differences are predictable. Republicans and voters not affiliated with either party strongly favor tax cuts over increased government spending to create jobs, while Democrats are evenly divided on the question. Most Democrats (60%) view government job creation as better for the economy in the long run, while 77% of Republicans and the plurality (47%) of unaffiliated voters see tax cuts as a better economic move."

From a July 20-24 poll, the Pew Research Center asked:  "If the government makes major cuts in federal spending in an effort to reduce the budget deficit, do you think these cuts would help the job situation, hurt the job situation, or not have much of an effect either way?"  Pew Research found:

  • 26% thought it would help the job situation
  • 27% thought it would hurt the job situation
  • 39% thought it would not have much of an effect
  • 1% thought it would have a mixed effect
  • 7% were unsure or refused to answer

 


Further information on methodology:  The survey was performed using a recorded voice, and respondents were asked to push buttons to answer questions.  Voters were called if they were registered to vote in Overland Park, and if they had voted in the November election of 2008 and/or the November election of 2010. Gender and age were determined by question, and party affiliation was determined by registration data. 

 

 


                                                                                                                                                               Site Meter

Posted by Benjamin Hodge on Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 7:36 PM

(0 Comments) Leave A Comment

Results, Part 1, Partial Survey Results of August 9-10, 2011, Poll in Overland Park

State & Local Reform Educational Foundation of KS

 

 

Part 1 of results

Telephone survey among likely 2012 voters in Overland Park, KS.  Conducted Tuesday, August 9; and Wednesday, August 10.  Margin of error +/- 5.4%.  For survey wording (questions 1 through 18), click here.  For accompanying information for comparison purposes, click here.  More information about survey methodology can be found at the bottom of this page.

 

 

 

Demographic information for poll results


Party breakdown:                             Count             Percent

Democratic:                           68                  20.0%

Republican:                         174                  51.2%

Unaffiliated:                           98                  28.8%

                                                                                             

Total:                                    340                 100% 

 

Gender breakdown:                         Count             Percent

Male:                                     153                  45%

Female:                                187                  55%

 

Total:                                    340                 100% 

 

Age breakdown:                               Count              Percent

Over 50:                                170                  50%

Under 50:                             170                  50%

 

Total:                                    340                 100%

 

 

Question:  Now I'm going to ask you some questions about your city government in Overland Park. Like many governments, the Overland Park city government faces budget shortfalls. Going forward, how should Overland Park balance its budget? Should the city government increase taxes, or cut spending?

 

To balance budget,

increase taxes or cut spending?    Count             Percent

Cut spending:                           227                66.8%

Increase taxes:                          79                 23.2%

Undecided:                                 34                 10.0%

 

Total:                                          340                 100%

  

 

Question:  Asked a different way... by how much should city spending be decreased? Not at all?  1-5%?  6-10%  Or 10% or more?

Spending cuts?  By how much?    Count             Percent

Not at all:                                    46                13.5%

1-5% in cuts:                           134                39.4%

6-10% in cuts:                         100                29.4%

10% or more in cuts:               38                 11.2%

Undecided:                                22                   6.5%

 

Total:                                        340                 100%

 

  

Question:  Generally speaking, would you prefer a more active government with more services and higher taxes, or a smaller government with fewer services and lower taxes?

More or less government?             Count             Percent

             Government with more

  services and higher taxes:    91                26.8%       

 

           Government with fewer

  services and lower taxes:    220                64.7%

 

            Undecided:                                    29                   8.5%

 

Total:                                        340                 100%

 

 

Question:  Would making cuts to city services be acceptable to you? Or unacceptable to you?

Cuts to city services?                      Count             Percent

Acceptable:                             187                  55.0%

Unacceptable:                        115                  33.8%

Undecided:                               38                  11.2%

 

Total:                                        340                 100%

 

 

Question:  Currently, the Overland Park City Council is planning to increase property taxes by 46% in order to balance the budget. Do you support this 46% tax increase, or do you oppose it?

Support or oppose the

planned tax increase?                      Count             Percent

Support:                                      47                 13.8%

Oppose:                                    273                 80.3%

Undecided:                                 20                   5.9%

           

Total:                                        340                 100%

 


Question:  There was one public hearing held, after the City Council announced the 46% property tax increase.  There are no more hearings planned before the City Council votes on the tax increase.  Do you think this one public hearing was enough, or should there be more public hearings?

 

Is one public hearing enough?      Count             Percent 

One public hearing

    was enough:                       44                  12.9%

 

More public hearings

    Should be held:                 283                 83.2%

 

Undecided:                              13                    3.8%

 

Total:                                        340                 100% 

 

 

Question:  In general, have city councilmen done a good job of representing Overland Park voters? Or have city councilmen lost touch with voters throughout the city?

City councilmen have:                     Count             Percent

            Done a good job

  representing voters:              90                 26.5%

 

            Lost touch with voters:              177                 52.1%


            Undecided:                                   73                  21.5%

 

Total:                                        340                 100%

 

 

Question:  Thinking ahead to the next presidential election … If the 2012 presidential election were held today, would you definitely vote to re-elect Barack Obama, probably vote to re-elect Obama, probably vote for someone else, or definitely vote for someone else?

Vote to re-elect Obama,

or for someone else?                       Count             Percent

Definitely vote to  

  re-elect Obama:                      80                  23.5%

 

Probably vote to

  re-elect Obama:                      47                 13.8%

 

Probably vote for

  someone else:                        41                 12.1%

 

Definitely vote for

  someone else:                     156                 45.9%

 

Undecided:                                16                   4.7%

 

Total:                                        340                 100%

 


  

Further information on methodology:  The survey was performed using a recorded voice, and respondents were asked to push buttons to answer questions.  Voters were called if they were registered to vote in Overland Park, and if they had voted in the November election of 2008 and/or the November election of 2010. Gender and age were determined by question, and party affiliation was determined by registration data. 

                                                                                                                                                               Site Meter

Posted by Benjamin Hodge on Saturday, August 13, 2011 at 12:28 AM

(0 Comments) Leave A Comment

Showing 1 to 10 of 15 posts Prev12Next